Data Home | Math Topics | Environment Topics | Topics Matrix | Master List | Help

Download the Data

PDF

Excel File

Text File

Minitab File

Data Set #044

About the Data
View the Data
Help with Using Data
Play with the data on StatCrunch
 

  Go to Top  

About the Data

About glacier retreat

    Glaciers are masses of ice moving downhill or downslope by either flowing as a solid and/or sliding along their base. Glaciers grow and shrink in size over time, much like your checking account; glaciers have budgets. Glaciers grow (lengthen, widen and thicken) under favorable conditions, either by increasing deposits (more snowfall, more snow avalanches, etc.), by decreasing withdrawals (less melting, less calving of icebergs, etc.), or both until a positive mass balance is achieved. Glaciers decrease in size (shrink or retreat) by decreasing deposits (less snowfall, etc.), increasing withdrawals (less melting, etc.), or both, until a negative mass balance is achieved. As an alpine or valley glacier shrinks in size, the end of the glacier is found farther and farther uphill; the glacier is said to retreat.

    Shrinking glaciers can have profound effects on man and the environment. In the Pacific Northwest of the US, glaciers are found at the heads of many major river systems in both the Cascade and Olympic Mountains. Melting of these glaciers provides water for streams and rivers, especially in the months of August, September and October, when streamflows are low due to lack of precipitation (Washington gets very little rain in the summer). The smaller the glacier, the smaller the outflow of meltwater. Low streamflows lead to reduced electricity generation at hydropower plants downstream from shrinking glaciers. And low streamflows can also have profound impacts on salmon viability, especially for the early fall spawners.

    Data on the recent changes in length of the Rainbow Glacier on Volcano Baker in the North Cascades of Washington State are shown in the table and figure (Pelto, 2001, personal communication). The data show the position of the snout (terminus) of the Rainbow Glacier as a function of time, compared with the 1985 position. The changes in position of the snout are essentially equivalent to changes in the total length of the glacier, as the head of the glacier does not change position significantly. As can be seen, the Rainbow Glacier has shrunk almost monotonically over the last 15 years. The students can fit a linear regression to these data to determine the typical rate of change, though they should first change calendar years to more practical values. There's a missing year; can linear interpolation be used to estimate a reasonable value? The Rainbow Glacier was 3750 m long in 1950; assuming a constant rate, how much did the glacier retreat in the previous 35 years? When will the glacier be half its 1950 length?

    Why is the Rainbow Glacier retreating? Students will be quick to answer "melting", but should remember that decreasing deposits can have just as big an impact on their bank account as increasing withdrawals.

Reference:     Mauri Pelto, Nichols College, North Cascades Glacier Climate Project
                    http://www.nichols.edu/departments/Glacier/

     
  Go to Top  

View the Data

 

Rainbow Glacier shrinkage, North Cascades, WA

data courtesy of Mauri Pelto, North Cascades Glacier Climate Project, Nichols College

position of glacier's snout relative to 1985 position

negative values = glacier retreats/shortens

   

year

position (meters)

1985

0

1986

-11

1987

-22

1988

-33

1989

-44

1990

-55

1991

-60

1992

-75

1993

-96

1994

-116

1995

-137

1996

-161

1997

 

1998

-201

1999

-241

2000

-246

 

  Go to Top